Why bilateral agreements are needed at all
Under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement, a country can transfer a mitigation outcome to another country, but only if it makes a corresponding adjustment - adding the transferred tonne back to its own national total so the reduction is not counted twice. That adjustment requires government-to-government agreement. Hence Implementation Agreements (IAs), which are legally binding bilateral treaties setting out the framework for those transfers. An IA is typically preceded by a Memorandum of Understanding, under which the two countries "work towards a legally binding Implementation Agreement".
The partner countries
As at 4 September 2026, Singapore has 12 Implementation Agreements:
- Papua New Guinea
- Ghana
- Bhutan
- Chile
- Peru
- Rwanda
- Paraguay
- Thailand
- Vietnam (signed 16 September 2025)
- Mongolia
- Philippines (the Philippines' first bilateral Article 6 agreement)
- Lao PDR (signed 4 September 2026)
The Lao PDR agreement is Singapore's 12th IA overall and its 4th with an ASEAN member state, alongside Thailand, Vietnam and the Philippines.
A currency warning. The National Climate Change Secretariat's International Collaboration page (https://www.nccs.gov.sg/singapores-climate-action/mitigation-efforts/internationalcollaboration/), and the newsroom filter on the carbon markets cooperation site, were both still showing the 11-country position when last checked. The 12-country figure rests on the September 2026 announcement of the Lao PDR agreement. Check both before quoting a number.
Memoranda of Understanding have also been signed with further partners, Cambodia among them.
The Eligibility Lists: bilateral, not universal
This is the detail that trips up buyers. The Eligibility List sets out which carbon crediting programmes and which methodologies satisfy both Singapore's criteria and the host country's. In Singapore's own words, "The Eligibility List differs by host countries as it is bilaterally agreed upon between Singapore and the respective host country."
Five country lists have been published: Ghana, Bhutan, Peru, Rwanda and Thailand. They fall into two very different shapes.
Broad lists (Ghana, Bhutan) admit whole programmes with carve-outs. For example, Ghana's list (last updated 29 July 2026) admits:
- Gold Standard for the Global Goals (GS4GG): all active methodologies published before 31 March 2023, except those in the "Land Use and Forestry and Agriculture" category.
- Verified Carbon Standard (VCS): all active methodologies published before 31 March 2023, except Sectoral Scope 14, with named exceptions allowed back in (including JNR Scenarios 2a and 3 and a list of specific VM methodologies). Where a VCS methodology is used, the project participant must also demonstrate sustainable development contributions by submitting a verification report under CCB Standards, SD VISta or another VCS-recognised standard.
Bhutan's list (also 29 July 2026) is similar and additionally admits the American Carbon Registry, the Global Carbon Council and Architecture for REDD+ Transactions, each with exclusions.
Narrow lists (Peru, Rwanda) name individual methodologies only. Peru's list (30 July 2026) admits three GS4GG methodologies and four VCS methodologies, and nothing else. Rwanda's list (30 July 2026) is an extensive but still explicitly enumerated set of GS4GG methodologies spanning cookstoves, agriculture, waste, marine fuels and micro-electrification.
The overall list was last updated 3 August 2026; the individual country lists on 29 and 30 July 2026. The five country lists are at:
The caveat every list carries
Even where a methodology appears on a list, applicability may be assessed again at project-application stage, and either government may refuse authorisation - for example where the methodology is not aligned with domestic law at the time of application, or where the crediting programme has suspended the methodology or placed it under formal review.
In other words, list inclusion is necessary but not sufficient.
Calls for projects, and the project register
Singapore has run joint calls for project applications with several partners. Recent closing or opening dates include Peru (6 October 2025), Bhutan (18 November 2025), Rwanda (30 January 2026) and Thailand (31 March 2026). Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis by both governments. Contracted projects must use bilaterally agreed methodologies and secure authorisation under the relevant IA.
The official Project Register exists at https://www.carbonmarkets-cooperation.gov.sg/project-register/ but, as at its last update on 14 August 2026, it is empty - it states that there are no projects registered at the moment. Do not read that as evidence of activity either way; read it as a register that has not yet been populated.
Government purchases, which are separate
Two strands of government activity sit alongside the corporate 5 per cent allowance:
- On 16 September 2025 Singapore announced it would contract 2.175 million tonnes of nature-based carbon credits from four projects - Kowen Antami REDD+ and Together for Forests REDD+ in Peru, Boomitra Grassland Restoration in Paraguay, and Kwahu Landscape Restoration in Ghana - worth approximately S$76 million, for delivery over 2026 to 2030. These count towards Singapore's own national target.
- A second Request for Proposals for high-quality carbon credits launched on 24 October 2025, and on 7 September 2026 MTI opened the second stage of a tender to purchase at least 12 million Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes.
These are government purchases against Singapore's national target, not part of the corporate offset allowance.